Search alternatives:
significant increases » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
substantial decrease » substantial increase (Expand Search), substantially increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
increases cell » increased cell (Expand Search)
significant increases » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
substantial decrease » substantial increase (Expand Search), substantially increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
increases cell » increased cell (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
The spatial pattern of matching values between population density and the accessibility of various facilities.
Published 2022Subjects: “…Cell Biology…”
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
PGRN deletion decreased the susceptibility to invasive <i>C</i>.<i>albicans</i> infection in mice.
Published 2022Subjects: -
51
Embryonic stem cells show centralization of probes but peripheral trend for interactions.
Published 2022Subjects: -
52
Cell-type-specific pairwise associations have higher coefficients of variation.
Published 2022Subjects: -
53
-
54
AZ10606120 treatment does not significantly increase apoptosis mediated cell death.
Published 2025Subjects: -
55
The combination of 3-MA and CDDP significantly increased CDDP-induced cell death.
Published 2025“…CDDP (20 μM), *<i><i>P</i></i> < 0.05, **<i><i>P</i></i> < 0.01, <i><i>ns</i></i> means not significant. <b>(C, D)</b> After 24 hours of treatment with 3-MA and CDDP, nasopharyngeal cancer cells showed a significant increase in JC-1 monomer fluorescence compared to both the CDDP-only treatment group and the control group (C, D, top rows). …”
-
56
-
57
-
58
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
59
-
60