Search alternatives:
significant increases » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
increases levels » increased levels (Expand Search), increased level (Expand Search), increasing levels (Expand Search)
force decrease » forces increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
Showing 21 - 40 results of 76,317 for search '(( significant increases levels ) OR ( significant ((force decrease) OR (fold decrease)) ))*', query time: 0.93s Refine Results
  1. 21
    Analysis of sphingosine levels from BAL.

    Analysis of sphingosine levels from BAL. by Henning Carstens (13132801)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 22
    The coefficients of the stiffness model according to condition levels of anchor points and a trend line of the coefficients.

    The coefficients of the stiffness model according to condition levels of anchor points and a trend line of the coefficients. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 23
    Comparison of <i>DNASE1</i> mRNA expression levels in bladder tumoral tissues (n = 41) and adjacent non-tumoral tissues (n = 19) using the TCGA dataset.

    Comparison of <i>DNASE1</i> mRNA expression levels in bladder tumoral tissues (n = 41) and adjacent non-tumoral tissues (n = 19) using the TCGA dataset. by Meihui Chen (1670020)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 24
    Significant cholesterol genes arranged by day.

    Significant cholesterol genes arranged by day. by Katherine M. Peterson (19746455)

    Published 2024
    “…Scatter plots of the RNASeq DESeq results, P-value vs. Fold Change for each sample day, arranged chronologically. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 25
    Spontaneous oxycodone withdrawal initially flattens NREM power rhythms, decreases low frequency and increases high frequency power.

    Spontaneous oxycodone withdrawal initially flattens NREM power rhythms, decreases low frequency and increases high frequency power. by Michael Gulledge (20577135)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 26
    Involvement of POm increases as discriminability of texture stimuli decreases.

    Involvement of POm increases as discriminability of texture stimuli decreases. by Jia Qi (400499)

    Published 2022
    “…Middle, POm suppression differentially affects task performance based on the level of task difficulty. Lower, increase of the error rate is significantly higher in high and medium task difficulty trials (high vs. low, <i>P</i> = 0.0274; medium vs. low, <i>P</i> = 0.0415, <i>n</i> = 7, paired <i>t</i> test). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 27
    Pairwise comparisons of peak net IMTP force for all training groups.

    Pairwise comparisons of peak net IMTP force for all training groups. by Nicholas J. Ripley (14709756)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 28
    Summary of Biomarker Expression in Benign Samples. The STT and LTT groups exhibit significant changes in biomarker expression compared to the nontreatment group, measured on a two-fold logarithmic scale. STT: Short-term dihydrotestosterone treatment. LTT: Long-term dihydrotestosterone treatment.

    Summary of Biomarker Expression in Benign Samples. The STT and LTT groups exhibit significant changes in biomarker expression compared to the nontreatment group, measured on a two-... by Jinho Lee (587173)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 29
    TGF-β1 increases levels of miR-22-3p and decreases change in human mammary epithelial cell count.

    TGF-β1 increases levels of miR-22-3p and decreases change in human mammary epithelial cell count. by Rhea Sullivan (18824253)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 30
    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss.

    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss. by Hongmei Qian (538647)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 31
    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss.

    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss. by Hongmei Qian (538647)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 32
    <i>Kpna1</i> KO mice show significant impairment in short-term recognition memory and avoidance learning and/or memory.

    <i>Kpna1</i> KO mice show significant impairment in short-term recognition memory and avoidance learning and/or memory. by Koki Sakurai (11690201)

    Published 2021
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 33
    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 34
    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 35
    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 36
    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 37
    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 38
    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 39
    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 40
    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: