Search alternatives:
significant increasing » significant increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly delayed » significantly related (Expand Search), significantly decreased (Expand Search), significantly elevated (Expand Search)
decrease » decreased (Expand Search), increase (Expand Search)
significant increasing » significant increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly delayed » significantly related (Expand Search), significantly decreased (Expand Search), significantly elevated (Expand Search)
decrease » decreased (Expand Search), increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Longer <i>L</i><sub><i>u</i></sub> significantly decreases and delays the peak of the sound-evoked CAPs of SGN fibers.
Published 2021“…Shaded regions correspond to the standard error of the mean and dashed lines correspond to the peaks of each CAP, labeled with the same colors as the CAPs. The decrease and delay of peak CAPs were significant for populations with <i>L</i><sub><i>u</i></sub> > 11 μm. …”
-
6
-
7
Data Sheet 1_Elevated relative humidity significantly decreases cannabinoid concentrations while delaying flowering development in Cannabis sativa L..docx
Published 2025“…Furthermore, high RH significantly suppressed cannabinoid accumulation: cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabichromenic acid (CBC-A) levels decreased by approximately 4.9-fold, 3.2-fold, and 13-fold, respectively. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Changes in the positive direction ratio as the time scale of the change direction increases.
Published 2022Subjects: -
15
Significant divergence in HDV and HBV time series trends between 1999–2020.
Published 2023Subjects: -
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Micropatterning significantly increases cell density.
Published 2019“…As noted by stars above trend lines, ECFC density significantly increased between 24 and 50 hours of culture time in both non-patterned (p = 0.0009) and micropatterned (p = 0.0002) cultures, while EC density did not (p = 1 non-patterned, p = 0.689 μp). …”