بدائل البحث:
significant interaction » significant reduction (توسيع البحث), significant attention (توسيع البحث)
interaction increases » infection increases (توسيع البحث), interventions increased (توسيع البحث), intervention decreases (توسيع البحث)
linear decrease » linear increase (توسيع البحث)
mean decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant interaction » significant reduction (توسيع البحث), significant attention (توسيع البحث)
interaction increases » infection increases (توسيع البحث), interventions increased (توسيع البحث), intervention decreases (توسيع البحث)
linear decrease » linear increase (توسيع البحث)
mean decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
161
-
162
-
163
Flowchart of the study population.
منشور في 2025"…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …"
-
164
Characteristics of study population.
منشور في 2025"…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …"
-
165
-
166
<i>Kpna1</i> KO mice show decreased anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze.
منشور في 2021الموضوعات: -
167
AZ10606120 treatment does not significantly increase apoptosis mediated cell death.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
-
176
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
منشور في 2019"…Consistent with the colours used in the previous figures, attended images are represented by the dark green lines and unattended images by the light green lines, while the pink–red gradient indicates increasing expectation. The significance of the interaction term was tested using the likelihood ratio test between the full model and the reduced model, which excluded the interaction fixed effect. …"
-
177
Means scores of CAM and CAM-MYCS.
منشور في 2025"…Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple linear regression. Participants demonstrated significantly higher awareness of scientifically established cancer causes (70.7%) compared to mythical ones (10.2%). …"
-
178
The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
منشور في 2024"…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …"
-
179
-
180