Search alternatives:
significant investment » significant enrichment (Expand Search), significant interest (Expand Search), significant inverse (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
investment decrease » investment increases (Expand Search)
significant investment » significant enrichment (Expand Search), significant interest (Expand Search), significant inverse (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
investment decrease » investment increases (Expand Search)
-
61
Heterogeneity test for population structure.
Published 2025“…Although scientific and technological investment can significantly increase innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, it curtails the development of residents’ leisure consumption potential. …”
-
62
Pearson test.
Published 2025“…Although scientific and technological investment can significantly increase innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, it curtails the development of residents’ leisure consumption potential. …”
-
63
Description of variables.
Published 2025“…Although scientific and technological investment can significantly increase innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, it curtails the development of residents’ leisure consumption potential. …”
-
64
Endogeneity test for variable lags.
Published 2025“…Although scientific and technological investment can significantly increase innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, it curtails the development of residents’ leisure consumption potential. …”
-
65
Descriptive statistics of the main variables.
Published 2025“…Although scientific and technological investment can significantly increase innovation and entrepreneurship vitality, it curtails the development of residents’ leisure consumption potential. …”
-
66
Regression results of the Callaway method.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
67
Regression results of crowding out effects.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
68
Article data.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
69
Overidentification test results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
70
Quantile regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
71
Instrumental variable regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
72
Other robust regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
73
Baseline regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
74
Results of propensity score matching.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
75
Parallel trend test.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
76
Placebo test.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
77
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
78
Cross-sectional dependence results.
Published 2024“…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
-
79
Autocorrelation test results.
Published 2024“…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
-
80
Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I.
Published 2024“…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”