Fabric anisotropy evolution of numerical samples with different shapes and sizes. by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Subjects:

Stress concentration factor value in the numerical samples with different shapes and sizes. by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Subjects:

Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”

Deviatoric stress-strain curves of numerical samples composed of elongated ellipsoids with different particle morphologies and particle sizes. by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Subjects:

Average contact force and percentage of strong contact force under different conditions: (a) different particle shapes, (b) different particle sizes. by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Subjects:

The force chain distributions of different numerical samples composed of elongated ellipsoids with different particle morphologies and particle sizes before shearing and after load... by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Subjects:

<i>Tillandsia utriculata</i> death rate data by size class. by Alexandra M. Campbell (3284094)

Subjects:

Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

The CDF of normal and tangential contact forces in numerical specimens after compression considering different particle morphologies: (a) normal contact force; (b) tangential conta... by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Subjects:

Arctigenin decreased proliferation in colorectal cancer cells with no significant effect on normal cells. by Xiang-Fan Chen (13932983)

Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale, Subscales by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Primary and secondary efficacy end points (intention-to-treat population). by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants at baseline. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Change in QIDS-SR-16 and MBI-HSS-MP by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Change in Demoralization Scale (DSII) by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO₂ laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”