بدائل البحث:
significant larger » significantly larger (توسيع البحث), significant barrier (توسيع البحث), significant dangers (توسيع البحث)
larger decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
side decrease » sizes decrease (توسيع البحث), fid decreased (توسيع البحث), step decrease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant larger » significantly larger (توسيع البحث), significant barrier (توسيع البحث), significant dangers (توسيع البحث)
larger decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
side decrease » sizes decrease (توسيع البحث), fid decreased (توسيع البحث), step decrease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
81
-
82
Rate of apoptosis in MCF-7 cells (ATO: 2.5 μM and GCB: 22.5 μM, 48 h, at 37°C).
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
90
-
91
Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
Theoretical framework.
منشور في 2025"…Holding other variables constant, a one-unit increase in demand and supply side risks results in 19.1% and 13.1% lead to decrease in operational performance of manufacturing companies, respectively. …"
-
99
Supplementary file survey questioner annex.
منشور في 2025"…Holding other variables constant, a one-unit increase in demand and supply side risks results in 19.1% and 13.1% lead to decrease in operational performance of manufacturing companies, respectively. …"
-
100
<i>Aedes aegypti</i> database from SAGO traps.
منشور في 2025"…IVM treatment reduced the number of females per trap per week from 3.29 ± 0.24 to 2.41 ± 0.20 (33.7% reduction), AGO from 1.58 ± 0.17 to 0.25 ± 0.05 (85.2% reduction), and AGO + IVM from 1.49 ± 0.17 to 0.53 ± 0.08 (67.78% reduction), based on Henderson’s formula. We observed a non-significant increase in the control area (no treatment provided) in the mosquito populations, increasing from 2.94 ± 0.24 in the pretreatment period to 3.25 ± 0.28 of the post treatment period.…"