Search alternatives:
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
-
181
-
182
-
183
-
184
-
185
-
186
Comparison of PCNA expression grades across different groups at various time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
187
-
188
Effect of ex vivo treatment with rhTGFβ1 or a TGFβ1 inhibitor on monocyte responses to rgE stimulation. Monocytes and NK cells purified from PBMC collected from 10 RZV recipients (demographics in S4 Table) before vaccination (D0) and 90 days post-vaccination (D90) were combined ex vivo and stimulated with VZV-rgE. A subset of D0 monocyte & NK cocultures was also treated with the TGFβ1 inhibitor LY (D0 LY), and a subset of D90 cocultures were supplemented with rhTGFβ1. The graph shows individual data points, means and p values calculated by Friedman test for repeated measures with FDR correction. LY treatment of cells collected on D0 significantly increased their activation to levels similar to D90. Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.
Published 2025“…Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.…”
-
189
-
190
Amplitude for A/L = 0.29.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
191
Top view of the experimental setup.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
192
Amplitude for A/L = 0.338.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
193
Parameters of energy harvesting.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
194
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
195
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
196
Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
197
Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
198
Amplitude for A/L = 0.03.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
199
Summary of experimentation results.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
200
Piezoelectric eel.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”