Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant aspect (Expand Search)
interaction aimed » interaction formed (Expand Search), interaction sites (Expand Search), interaction site (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant aspect (Expand Search)
interaction aimed » interaction formed (Expand Search), interaction sites (Expand Search), interaction site (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
-
165
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
Interaction analysis for OHCA incidence of insomnia according to depression.
Published 2023Subjects: -
174
-
175
-
176
Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…In this case-control study, a surface electromyography (sEMG) was conducted in the peroneus lateralis longus (PLL) and peroneus lateralis brevis (PLB) musculature during the layup gesture, on 58 female basketball players, 29 with and 29 without CAI. The presence of significant differences in the group: measurement interaction was found in the variables left PLL RMS left-hand layup and right PLL maximum peak left-hand layup (X<sup>2</sup>(6)=22.246, p = 0.001, X<sup>2</sup>(6)=12.99, p = 0.043) respectively, where higher normalized activation values are observed in CAI group. …”
-
177
Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…In this case-control study, a surface electromyography (sEMG) was conducted in the peroneus lateralis longus (PLL) and peroneus lateralis brevis (PLB) musculature during the layup gesture, on 58 female basketball players, 29 with and 29 without CAI. The presence of significant differences in the group: measurement interaction was found in the variables left PLL RMS left-hand layup and right PLL maximum peak left-hand layup (X<sup>2</sup>(6)=22.246, p = 0.001, X<sup>2</sup>(6)=12.99, p = 0.043) respectively, where higher normalized activation values are observed in CAI group. …”
-
178
-
179
-
180
Tests of interactions and sensitivity analysis.
Published 2023“…The two significant Asian associations were improved with a test of interaction with <i>P</i>-value of0.02–0.03. …”