Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant aspect (Expand Search)
interaction aimed » interaction formed (Expand Search), interaction sites (Expand Search), interaction site (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 15,449 for search '(( significant largest decrease ) OR ( significant interaction aimed ))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 1
    The ATG8-interacting motif 1 (AIM1) and AIM5 in p20 are indispensable for its interaction with ATG8 and autophagy induction.

    The ATG8-interacting motif 1 (AIM1) and AIM5 in p20 are indispensable for its interaction with ATG8 and autophagy induction. by Yongle Zhang (11355546)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(A) Schematic diagram showing substitution mutants in the AIMs of p20. The AIMs in p20 were predicted using iLIR Autophagy Database (<a href="https://ilir.warwick.ac.uk/search.php" target="_blank">https://ilir.warwick.ac.uk/search.php</a>). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Results of significant categorical-interacted variables.

    Results of significant categorical-interacted variables. by Neero Gumsar Sorum (21553454)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    AIM- Stereo paradigm.

    AIM- Stereo paradigm. by Sonisha Neupane (18784421)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Illustration of the aim of this work.

    Illustration of the aim of this work. by Enzo Kingma (16545090)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Aiming.

    Aiming. by William E. A. Sheppard (11663025)

    Published 2021
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Decrease of injuries.

    Decrease of injuries. by Petr Fulin (8380320)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Significant interactions between segment immersions and condition.

    Significant interactions between segment immersions and condition. by Jakub Nastaj (7235435)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Decrease of admissions and lead diagnoses.

    Decrease of admissions and lead diagnoses. by Petr Fulin (8380320)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Log stereoacuities of Randot, Titmus, and AIM Stereo.

    Log stereoacuities of Randot, Titmus, and AIM Stereo. by Sonisha Neupane (18784421)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    The most significant module from the protein-protein interaction network.

    The most significant module from the protein-protein interaction network. by Chao Liu (43092)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Sensitivity analyses of seroprevalence with the largest sample size study omitted.

    Sensitivity analyses of seroprevalence with the largest sample size study omitted. by Yu Zhou (89766)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    The first β-strand defines the AIM-dependent interaction profiles of ATG8 isoforms.

    The first β-strand defines the AIM-dependent interaction profiles of ATG8 isoforms. by Erin K. Zess (465403)

    Published 2019
    “…AIM, ATG8-interacting motif; ATG8, autophagy-related protein 8.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Significant relationships between QOL measures on infusion day and day 7.

    Significant relationships between QOL measures on infusion day and day 7. by Jordan K. Abbott (8934239)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Aims and effectiveness of included studies.

    Aims and effectiveness of included studies. by Alexander P. Noar (17125125)

    Published 2023
    “…Of these, 50 papers met the inclusion criteria. The most common aim of CoPs was to directly improve a clinical outcome, with 19 studies aiming to achieve this. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Between-location, within-group pairwise comparisons for significant Group × Location interaction.

    Between-location, within-group pairwise comparisons for significant Group × Location interaction. by Hugo Massé-Alarie (2936439)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Percentage of eligible included studies showing significance on time, group and interaction.

    Percentage of eligible included studies showing significance on time, group and interaction. by Carlijn Damsté (18265075)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Bland-Altman tests of AIM Stereo between the two runs.

    Bland-Altman tests of AIM Stereo between the two runs. by Sonisha Neupane (18784421)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Significant differences in the use of interactional metadiscourse features across genres between FLOB and COCE.

    Significant differences in the use of interactional metadiscourse features across genres between FLOB and COCE. by Isabelle Chou (11605999)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Kendall’s rank correlations and histograms between Randot, Titmus, and AIM Stereo.

    Kendall’s rank correlations and histograms between Randot, Titmus, and AIM Stereo. by Sonisha Neupane (18784421)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Test duration using AIM Stereo for run 1 and run 2.

    Test duration using AIM Stereo for run 1 and run 2. by Sonisha Neupane (18784421)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: