Significant achievement in reduction of maternal and neonatal deaths. by Ruoyan Gai Tobe (102986)

Lab parameters–Significant reduction in means. by Harleen Kaur (288288)

“…Adjuvant homoeopathic medicines were given in the treatment group and SOC was given to both groups. The duration of oxygen support was compared as the primary outcome. …”

Results of a meta-analysis of the surgery risk factors: A: Number of implants: there was no significant difference in number of implants between two groups (1 vs > 1); B: Reduction: there was significant difference in reduction between two groups (reduction vs no reduction); C: Reduction method: there was significant difference in reduction method between two groups (closed vs open); D: Delayed surgery: there was no significant difference in delayed surgery between two groups (≤24h vs > 24h); E: Capsular decompression: there was no significant difference in capsular decompression between two groups (decompression vs no decompression). by Zihang Xu (4028183)

“…<p>Results of a meta-analysis of the surgery risk factors: A: Number of implants: there was no significant difference in number of implants between two groups (1 vs > 1); B: Reduction: there was significant difference in reduction between two groups (reduction vs no reduction); C: Reduction method: there was significant difference in reduction method between two groups (closed vs open); D: Delayed surgery: there was no significant difference in delayed surgery between two groups (≤24h vs > 24h); E: Capsular decompression: there was no significant difference in capsular decompression between two groups (decompression vs no decompression).…”

Highlights the anatomical sites with significant volume reduction or a tendency towards volume reduction, found in this study. by José Thiago de Souza de Castro (13839986)

Decrease of injuries. by Petr Fulin (8380320)

Subjects:

The significantly altered bacteria between stress group and control group. by Durga Paudel (12635367)

Subjects:

Reduction status and screw direction in the BFN and PFNA groups. by Takehiro Matsubara (3277809)

Subjects:

Behaviometric predictors of expertise groups after variable reduction. by Philip Wismer (14279365)

Brain areas with significant rCBF increase in within-group comparisons in each group. by Yutaro Mori (3125268)

Results of a meta-analysis of the preoperative risk factors: A: age: there was no significant difference in the age between two groups(AVN vs no AVN); B: gender: there was a signif... by Zihang Xu (4028183)

Degeneration Saline group presented with significant decreased final weight in relation to other groups. by Flavia Gomes Velasque Gama (21175112)

Decrease of admissions and lead diagnoses. by Petr Fulin (8380320)

Subjects:

Between group differences for the ‘NAC group’ and ‘no-NAC group’. by Davinder Hans (12015279)

The mean cost reduction per patient across the study groups. by Osama Mohamed Ibrahim (12006954)

Mindfulness-based stress reduction interventions. by Xiaoli Liu (165371)

Subjects:

Sensitivity analyses of seroprevalence with the largest sample size study omitted. by Yu Zhou (89766)

Regions showing significant functional connectivity differences between groups. by Chizuko Hamada (11831507)

Average tumor tumor volume reduction rate and significance probability by group using a prediction-based statistical simulation (n = 3). by Seon Min Lee (8599773)

“…<p>Average tumor tumor volume reduction rate and significance probability by group using a prediction-based statistical simulation (n = 3).…”

Meta regression result for MELD score covariate significantly influencing GLS reduction in cirrhotic group with R² = 28%. by Denio A. Ridjab (12822317)

“…<p>Meta regression result for MELD score covariate significantly influencing GLS reduction in cirrhotic group with R² = 28%.…”

Data of BFN group and PFNA group. by Takehiro Matsubara (3277809)

Subjects: