Mean and standard error of pupil diameter in the dim states. by Tomoe Hayakawa (20978784)

“…However, in the second experiment (Experiment 2), the pupil diameter in the TD group showed a significant decrease. Significance levels are based on unpaired t-tests (**<i>p</i> <  0.01).…”

An androgen antagonist decreases the levels of Rubicon and GATA4 in Sertoli cells. by Tadashi Yamamuro (6955694)

“…(B–D) Quantification of relative Rubicon (B), GATA4 (C), and WT1 (D) levels in (A). (E) Autophagic flux assay in 15P-1 cells, based on LC3-II and p62 degradation. …”

Mean case duration before and after intervention (t-statistic = -3.35, p <i>< </i>0.001), indicating a statistically significant difference in means. by Mohammad Bakhtiari (11838264)

Decadal mean regional hydrology. by Nic Gedney (19762301)

Significant Kruskal-Wallis effects of Certainty (at p < .05 level), df = 1. by Katharine Lee (14926176)

Line graph showing the increase or decrease in the average number of bee swarms caught over the past three years (Mean  by Beatrice T. Nganso (4114768)

CFU-Mk is significantly decreased by GATA1s overexpression in <i>GATA1s</i> strains. by Shiori Matsuo (10492159)

Tests for significant covariation need to not use covariation in producing their alignments. by Elena Rivas (7973)

Subjects:

The frequency distribution of Spiritual Well-being levels based on Anxiety/Depression levels in cancer patients (n = 200). by Mohsen Vakili Sadeghi (21567467)

Subjects:

The statistic thresholds of the moment order <i>q</i> based on significance level <i>α</i> = 0.05. by Yuqing Long (4799922)

“…<p>The statistic thresholds of the moment order <i>q</i> based on significance level <i>α</i> = 0.05.</p>…”

The empirical power for different sample sizes under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications. by Zhen Meng (308419)

“…<p>The empirical power for different sample sizes under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.…”

The empirical power for scenarios (i)—(v) under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications. by Zhen Meng (308419)

“…<p>The empirical power for scenarios (i)—(v) under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.…”

The correlation coefficient, significance level, and corresponding sample scatter plot between modules and saponins. by Zhongce Wang (16845893)

Results of an ANOVA test on the effects of Season and Station on biomass (*: significant, at the 0.05 level). by Dimitrios Damalas (640270)

Flow diagram of the study. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

Subjects:

Baseline characteristics of patients. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

Subjects:

Most significant muscle activation values. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

Subjects:

Overlap in the number of significant gene-level associations between MAGMA, eMAGMA, and S-PrediXcan. by Zachary F. Gerring (6954416)

“…<p>Significant MAGMA genes (N = 137) were selected using Bonferroni correction for the entire list of gene-based <i>P</i> values (i.e. 0.05/18042 = 2.77×10⁻⁶). …”

CFA factor loadings, t statistics and significance level for IBL and INT teaching strategies. by Fabiola Sanda Chiriacescu (14509871)

Procedure related data, LBNP, LBPP and hypoxia. by Marcus Thudium (6441863)

Subjects: