Search alternatives:
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
Temporal profiles of the key BO-NN features.
Published 2020“…The shifts associated with non-significant prediction accuracies are greyed-out. <b>(c)</b> The results of the MDS for the key BO-NN features. …”
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
DAS analysis comparison across different significance levels and methods.
Published 2020“…The performance of SCATS, Census and DEXSeq was evaluated using different significance levels (α = 0.05, 0.01, 0.005). For within major cell class comparison (GABAergic, Glutamatergic, Non-neuronal), Census yielded much higher DAS detection rate (~0.6) than SCATS (<0.1), indicating possible inflated false positive results for Census as we expect to see smaller splicing differences for cells within the same major cell class.…”
-
96
phospho-PMK-1 levels are not significantly changed under ADR.
Published 2023“…PMK-1 activity was not increased under ADR, as no significant difference was observed based on an unpaired two-samples <i>t</i>-test, with a possible trend to lower activity levels under ADR.…”
-
97
Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?
Published 2019“…These changes were especially important in plant species with large floral displays, which became less specialized with the visit-based measure of interaction strength. At the network level we found significant changes in all properties analysed. …”
-
98
-
99
-
100