Search alternatives:
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Results of NDVI trend analysis and significant test in Northeast China from 2001 to 2020.
Published 2022Subjects: -
15
-
16
Plasma metabolites that significantly differ between HFD-fed and chow-fed minipigs.
Published 2024Subjects: -
17
-
18
Plasma metabolites that significantly differ between female HFD-fed and chow-fed minipigs.
Published 2024Subjects: -
19
Plasma metabolites that significantly differ between male HFD-fed and chow-fed minipigs.
Published 2024Subjects: -
20
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”