Search alternatives:
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
Tests for significant covariation need to not use covariation in producing their alignments.
Published 2023Subjects: -
44
-
45
The statistic thresholds of the moment order <i>q</i> based on significance level <i>α</i> = 0.05.
Published 2021“…<p>The statistic thresholds of the moment order <i>q</i> based on significance level <i>α</i> = 0.05.</p>…”
-
46
The empirical power for different sample sizes under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.
Published 2023“…<p>The empirical power for different sample sizes under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.…”
-
47
The empirical power for scenarios (i)—(v) under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.
Published 2023“…<p>The empirical power for scenarios (i)—(v) under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.…”
-
48
-
49
-
50
Overlap in the number of significant gene-level associations between MAGMA, eMAGMA, and S-PrediXcan.
Published 2019“…<p>Significant MAGMA genes (N = 137) were selected using Bonferroni correction for the entire list of gene-based <i>P</i> values (i.e. 0.05/18042 = 2.77×10<sup>−6</sup>). …”
-
51
-
52
-
53
UK Biobank analysis: Numbers of significant independent associations detected.
Published 2020“…<p>Numbers of independent gene-based associations (at Bonferroni-corrected 5% significance level) detected by each method across 128 UK Biobank traits. …”
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60