Showing 61 - 80 results of 40,240 for search '(( significant level decrease ) OR ( significant ((larger increases) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 1.41s Refine Results
  1. 61

    DataSheet_2_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx by Erhan Huang (17772852)

    Published 2024
    “…Topographic factors had a relatively larger influence at higher taxonomic levels (i.e., family>genus>species), but with a relatively slow rise with the increase in spatial scale.…”
  2. 62

    DataSheet_3_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx by Erhan Huang (17772852)

    Published 2024
    “…Topographic factors had a relatively larger influence at higher taxonomic levels (i.e., family>genus>species), but with a relatively slow rise with the increase in spatial scale.…”
  3. 63

    DataSheet_1_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx by Erhan Huang (17772852)

    Published 2024
    “…Topographic factors had a relatively larger influence at higher taxonomic levels (i.e., family>genus>species), but with a relatively slow rise with the increase in spatial scale.…”
  4. 64
  5. 65
  6. 66
  7. 67
  8. 68
  9. 69
  10. 70
  11. 71

    DataSheet_1_Effect of sustained decreases in sedentary time and increases in physical activity on liver enzymes and indices in type 2 diabetes.docx by Jonida Haxhi (552548)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>Throughout the 3-year period, NAFLD markers did not change in the control group, whereas ALT, γGT, FLI, and HSI decreased in the intervention group, with significant between-group differences, despite modest MVPA increases, which however were associated with larger decrements in SED-time and reciprocal increments in LPA. …”
  12. 72

    Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  13. 73
  14. 74
  15. 75
  16. 76
  17. 77
  18. 78
  19. 79
  20. 80