Search alternatives:
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
level regression » panel regression (Expand Search), model regression (Expand Search), local regression (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search)
level regression » panel regression (Expand Search), model regression (Expand Search), local regression (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Significant interaction (time by group) for PPTd.
Published 2022“…<p>The measurement of pain pressure threshold (mean±standard error) on the Deltoid (PPTd) showed that responders (black solid line) demonstrated a significant decrease in PPTd following eccentric exercise. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
Total tau levels are significantly decreased in the healthy older brains compared to the younger brains.
Published 2023“…Data represent mean ± SEM (A iii and B ii). An increased level of PHF1 immunoreactivity was observed in older brains of resected tissues although it was not significant (B iii).…”
-
5
-
6
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
7
Mean values of participants’ heart rate.
Published 2023“…Additionally, a motivational decrease was observed for the high motivation group due to the interruption. …”
-
8
Regression results.
Published 2025“…The results revealed that from 2010 to 2020, the population agglomeration level of the Xi’an metropolitan area showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20