Showing 121 - 140 results of 25,757 for search '(( significant limitations include ) OR ( significant ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.63s Refine Results
  1. 121
  2. 122
  3. 123
  4. 124
  5. 125
  6. 126

    Features and limitations of the existing models. by Abdul Rahaman Wahab Sait (20490138)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>Early Lung Cancer (LC) detection is essential for reducing the global mortality rate. The limitations of traditional diagnostic techniques cause challenges in identifying LC using medical imaging data. …”
  7. 127
  8. 128
  9. 129

    Risk of Bias summary for RCTs included. by Cheng Li (6339)

    Published 2025
    “…After removing duplicates and screening, 10 studies (6 RCTs, 4 non-RCTs) published between 2010 and 2023 with 602 participants met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The random effects model showed significant improvement in sleep quality with music therapy (SMD: −0.79; 95% CI, −1.25 to −0.33; P < .001). …”
  10. 130

    Risk of bias for RCTs studies included. by Cheng Li (6339)

    Published 2025
    “…After removing duplicates and screening, 10 studies (6 RCTs, 4 non-RCTs) published between 2010 and 2023 with 602 participants met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The random effects model showed significant improvement in sleep quality with music therapy (SMD: −0.79; 95% CI, −1.25 to −0.33; P < .001). …”
  11. 131
  12. 132
  13. 133
  14. 134
  15. 135

    Included studies. by Vanessa Bacal (21368156)

    Published 2025
    “…However, there is a significant limitation in the accuracy of mosaic embryos.…”
  16. 136

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  17. 137
  18. 138
  19. 139
  20. 140