Search alternatives:
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Soil partice-size distribution.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
5
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites....
Published 2025“…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”