Showing 281 - 300 results of 18,095 for search '(( significant linear decrease ) OR ( significant ((shape decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.56s Refine Results
  1. 281

    Data. by Haiwei Li (282229)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  2. 282
  3. 283
  4. 284
  5. 285

    A Comparison of Pediatric Prehospital Opioid Encounters and Social Vulnerability by Stephen Sandelich (19991783)

    Published 2024
    “…The analysis demonstrated that as socioeconomic status (SES) improves, the likelihood of opioid-related activations increases significantly supported by a significant negative linear trend (Estimate = −0.2971, SE = 0.1172, z = −2.54, <i>p</i> = 0.0112. …”
  6. 286

    A sample choice question with a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  7. 287
  8. 288
  9. 289
  10. 290

    A Locally Linear Dynamic Strategy for Manifold Learning. by Weifan Wang (4669081)

    Published 2025
    “…For 10-30% noise, where the Hebbian network employs a local linear transform, learning selectively increases signal direction alignment (blue) while simultaneously decreasing noise direction alignment (orange). …”
  11. 291

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  12. 292

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  13. 293

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  14. 294

    A sample choice question without a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  15. 295
  16. 296
  17. 297
  18. 298
  19. 299
  20. 300