The structure of attention gate block [31]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

DSC block and its application network structure. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

The structure of multi-scale residual block [30]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

The structure of IRAU and Res2Net+ block [22]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

Loss of C1-FDX results in a reduction of the CI and CV activity. by Baoyin Chen (2635399)

Study on the expression of mRNA related to biofilm formation of <i>C. albicans</i> by CSR extract (100 μg/mL). by Xuxi Cheng (22453447)

Prediction of transition readiness. by Sharon Barak (4803966)

“…In most transition domains, help needed did not decrease with age and was not affected by function. …”

Dataset visualization diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Dataset sample images. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Performance comparison of different models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

BiFormer structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

GSConv module structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Performance comparison of three loss functions. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

mAP0.5 Curves of various models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Network loss function change diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Comparative diagrams of different indicators. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”