Trend of specific mental health disorders for all services utilization between 2016 and 2022. by Fernanda Talarico (807333)

Subjects:

Trend of mental health-related services utilization between 2016 and 2022. by Fernanda Talarico (807333)

Subjects:

Comparison of mental health-related services utilization between the pre (2016–2019) and post (2020–2022) pandemic onset periods. by Fernanda Talarico (807333)

Subjects:

Trend of all service utilization for all conditions between 2016 and 2022. by Fernanda Talarico (807333)

Subjects:

Results of linear mixed models (LMMs) on linguistic timescale tracking for the phrase, word, syllable, and phoneme rates. by Elena Bolt (20396190)

Distribution of the same ingredient across different IDDSI levels (Percentages and frequencies) and statistical significance analysis (Chi-square analysis). by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

BMI groups by SES. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

BMISES_Data_Part2. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

Logistic regression for LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

Logistic regression for HSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

Logistic regression for overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

BMISES_Data_Part1. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

Baseline characteristics of overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

Diagram of study population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”

Results from linear regression analysis for δ¹³C or δ¹⁵N and collection date. by Nathan D. McTigue (10706460)

Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m². …”