Search alternatives:
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
-
1181
Data Sheet 1_Lack of association between genetic variations in CYP3A5 and blood pressure or hypertension risk in the UK biobank.pdf
Published 2025“…While some previous studies reported that CYP3A5 variants were associated with decreased blood pressure and risk of HTN, others reported no associations. …”
-
1182
Table 1_Association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in adults: the mediating role of body mass index.docx
Published 2025“…RCS analysis further revealed a linear relationship between DI-GM and MetS prevalence. …”
-
1183
Data Sheet 1_Longitudinal changes in bodyweight, body condition, and muscle condition in ageing pet cats: findings from the Cat Prospective Ageing and Welfare Study.docx
Published 2025“…All three metrics showed significant non-linear associations with age. Bodyweight increased slightly from age 7 to 10 (estimated marginal mean 4.77–4.82 kg) before decreasing to 4.30 kg by age 16 years. …”
-
1184
SEAwise Report on improved predictive models of growth, production and stock quality under different habitat scenarios and incorporating experimental results
Published 2025“…Summer temperature was not a significant driver of the individual growth. Mediated length-based growth models and linear mixed models applied to weight-at-age data of six stocks showed forecast potential for only one stock (sol.27.20-24). …”
-
1185
Ultimate Lateral resistance of Tetrapod Pile Foundation in Rate-dependent and Strain-softening Clay
Published 2025“…The effect of the reciprocal of soil sensitivity is more significant, while the strain rate <b>exhibits</b> a linear positive interaction with the ultimate lateral resistance. …”
-
1186
Table 1_Global, regional, and national burdens of rheumatoid arthritis among people aged 60 years and older from 1990 to 2021: a trend analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Stu...
Published 2025“…Background<p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) poses a significant global health burden, especially among individuals aged 60 and older. …”
-
1187
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1188
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1189
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1190
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1191
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1192
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1193
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1194
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1195
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1196
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1197
Data (F. Ghasemian).sav
Published 2025“…The re-</p><p dir="ltr">sults of the multiple linear regression analysis also showed that with an increase in the total score of</p><p dir="ltr">maternal lifestyles, the antenatal anxiety score decreases significantly after controlling the Demo-</p><p dir="ltr">graphic and obstetrics variable. …”
-
1198
Scale and environmental data for the analysis of year class growth of coregonids from Lake Starnberg
Published 2025“…During the observed period, phosphorus concentrations decreased, indicating reduced nutrient availability, whereas spring temperatures showed no significant long-term trend. …”
-
1199
Spatiotemporal variations of fractional vegetation cover and its response to topography on the Loess Plateau of China from 1995 to 2024
Published 2025“…FVC responses to terrain factors are significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05), except for aspect (<i>p</i> > 0.05). …”
-
1200
Table 1_Effect of a mindfulness-based cognitive behavior therapy intervention on occupational burnout among school teachers.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Conclusions<p>The prevalence of high EE and low PA decreased in both arms. However, the prevalence of high DP remained constant in the treatment arm but sharply decreased in the control arm. …”