Search alternatives:
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search), significantly changed (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
high increase » highest increase (Expand Search), slight increase (Expand Search), which increases (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 851 for search '(( significant linear decrease ) OR ( significantly high increase ))~', query time: 0.67s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Significant condition.

    Significant condition. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…Over time, the content of C-A-H stabilized at 22%, the amount of CH decreased from 19% to 14%, whereas the amount of AFt increased to 15.9% by Day 28. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Results of significance for regression factors.

    Results of significance for regression factors. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…Over time, the content of C-A-H stabilized at 22%, the amount of CH decreased from 19% to 14%, whereas the amount of AFt increased to 15.9% by Day 28. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Response to NLC for 1 122 native plant species with significant null models.

    Response to NLC for 1 122 native plant species with significant null models. by Kaixuan Pan (11714457)

    Published 2021
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Costs in USD of cataract treatment procedures according to year.

    Costs in USD of cataract treatment procedures according to year. by Arthur Gustavo Fernandes (5766305)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Number of cataract treatment procedures according to the region.

    Number of cataract treatment procedures according to the region. by Arthur Gustavo Fernandes (5766305)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Trends in the absolute number of cataract treatment procedure from 2000 to 2019 according to the technique.

    Trends in the absolute number of cataract treatment procedure from 2000 to 2019 according to the technique. by Arthur Gustavo Fernandes (5766305)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Trends in the absolute number of cataract treatment procedure from 2000 to 2019.

    Trends in the absolute number of cataract treatment procedure from 2000 to 2019. by Arthur Gustavo Fernandes (5766305)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Comparison on rate of cataract procedures per 10,000 people in 2000 and 2019 by state (Source: Go-cart.io [17]).

    Comparison on rate of cataract procedures per 10,000 people in 2000 and 2019 by state (Source: Go-cart.io [17]). by Arthur Gustavo Fernandes (5766305)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Rates of cataract surgical procedures per 10,000 people according to region.

    Rates of cataract surgical procedures per 10,000 people according to region. by Arthur Gustavo Fernandes (5766305)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Linear regression between PDQS and Body Mass Index (BMI) of school-aged children and Adolescents in Zanzibar.

    Linear regression between PDQS and Body Mass Index (BMI) of school-aged children and Adolescents in Zanzibar. by Fatma Ali Said (17262485)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Linear contact model.

    Linear contact model. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Average annual change, 95% confidence interval and significance for sum concentrations of different compound groups.

    Average annual change, 95% confidence interval and significance for sum concentrations of different compound groups. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Model fit for Mixed-Effects Multi-linear Regressions with PSS as a continuous outcome measure.

    Model fit for Mixed-Effects Multi-linear Regressions with PSS as a continuous outcome measure. by Laura S. P. Bloomfield (3820531)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Linear regression between PCB TEQ and ∑PCB in different study areas.

    Linear regression between PCB TEQ and ∑PCB in different study areas. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Linear regression between ∑PCB and ∑indicator PCB in different study areas.

    Linear regression between ∑PCB and ∑indicator PCB in different study areas. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Significance (p-value), standard error, and R<sup>2</sup> scores for the linear relation between maximum dispersal distance and cross-validated AUC (AUC-cv) across all the network models for each study species.

    Significance (p-value), standard error, and R<sup>2</sup> scores for the linear relation between maximum dispersal distance and cross-validated AUC (AUC-cv) across all the network... by Damian O. Ortiz-Rodríguez (17343308)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Linear regression between PCDD/F TEQ and ∑PCDD/F in different study areas.

    Linear regression between PCDD/F TEQ and ∑PCDD/F in different study areas. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Linear regression between PCB TEQ and PCDD/F TEQ in different study areas.

    Linear regression between PCB TEQ and PCDD/F TEQ in different study areas. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Model fit for Mixed-Effects Multi-linear Regressions with PSS-Moderate (PSS> = 14) as a binary outcome measure.

    Model fit for Mixed-Effects Multi-linear Regressions with PSS-Moderate (PSS> = 14) as a binary outcome measure. by Laura S. P. Bloomfield (3820531)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit production per female tree, (C) seed production per female tree; and (D) seed weight. Farming system refers to ecological vs. conventional practices; CCA1 refers to the first axis of the CCA and depicts the relationship between the % of natural habitats in the landscape and the composition of the pollinator community (increase abundance of wild bees with the increase in natural habitats); Male-to-female ratio and Male-to-female ratio<sup>2</sup> indicate linear and quadratic terms, respectively. Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [75].

    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... by Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: