Search alternatives:
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
linear increase » year increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
linear increase » year increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Presentation_1_The Bacterial Community Diversity of Bathroom Hot Tap Water Was Significantly Lower Than That of Cold Tap and Shower Water.zip
Published 2021“…The most abundant families were Burkholderiaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, unclassified Alphaproteobacteria, unclassified Corynebacteriales, and Mycobacteriaceae. A multiple linear regression suggests that the bacterial community diversity increased with water temperature and the age of the simulated PPS, decreased with total chlorine residual concentration, and had a limited seasonal variation. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
16
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
17
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
18
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
19
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
20
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”