Search alternatives:
significant long » significant loss (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search), significant change (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
long decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant long » significant loss (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search), significant change (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
long decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. (<b>B)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on day 22. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
HFD decreases ITM and alters metabolic homeostasis.
Published 2025“…Two-way ANOVA, n.s., not significant, ** p < 0.01). <b>(F)</b> Long-term memory (LTM) was significantly decreased in the HFD group. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Modeling the relationship between cancer level in hemolymph and MarBTN in tank eDNA.
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
-
18
Alterations of Ceramides, Acylcarnitines, GlyceroLPLs, and Amines in NSCLC Tissues
Published 2024Subjects: -
19
-
20
Metabolites with decreasing levels during the development.
Published 2025“…<p>Temporal profiles of polar metabolites and lipids with SCN levels significantly decreasing from E19 to P28. Rhythmicity was determined by eJTK; full or dashed lines depict the profiles that either did or did not pass the significance threshold (FDR-adjusted <i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.…”