Search alternatives:
significant main » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
main biased » male biased (Expand Search), mainly based (Expand Search)
significant main » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
main biased » male biased (Expand Search), mainly based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Depleted antibody secreting cells did not result in decreased donor specific antibody in non-sensitized animals.
Published 2022“…(A) T (CD3<sup>+</sup>) and (B) B (CD45R<sup>+</sup>) cell flow crossmatch was performed in non-sensitized animals. IgG1<sup>+</sup> in the T cell flow crossmatch was the only DSA that BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> significantly decreased compared to APRIL<sup>-/-</sup> (p<0.03). …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
Mean scores for each item of the training course’s satisfaction test.
Published 2022Subjects: “…probabilistic reasoning biases…”
-
7
-
8
Egger’s test of publication bias for the pooled MD estimate of MPV between PE and NT groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
9
Egger’stest of publication bias for the pooled WMD estimate of PC between PE and NT groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test.
Published 2022Subjects: “…probabilistic reasoning biases…”
-
14
Annual number of outpatient visits in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
-
16
-
17
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
-
19
Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test (<i>n</i> = 900).
Published 2022Subjects: “…probabilistic reasoning biases…”
-
20
Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up (<i>n</i> = 662).
Published 2022Subjects: “…probabilistic reasoning biases…”