Search alternatives:
significant marked » significant based (Expand Search), significant male (Expand Search), significant canker (Expand Search)
marked increases » marked increase (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant marked » significant based (Expand Search), significant male (Expand Search), significant canker (Expand Search)
marked increases » marked increase (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit production per female tree, (C) seed production per female tree; and (D) seed weight. Farming system refers to ecological vs. conventional practices; CCA1 refers to the first axis of the CCA and depicts the relationship between the % of natural habitats in the landscape and the composition of the pollinator community (increase abundance of wild bees with the increase in natural habitats); Male-to-female ratio and Male-to-female ratio<sup>2</sup> indicate linear and quadratic terms, respectively. Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [75].
Published 2025“…Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0307357#pone.0307357.ref075" target="_blank">75</a>].…”
-
17
-
18
Results of normal and wide step width (cm).
Published 2025“…Transverse ankle-hip coordination showed an in-phase pattern in wide conditions during push-off (p=0.044), during LR (p=0.022). Wide walking, significantly increased coordination variability of the sagittal ankle-knee during LR and decreased transverse ankle-hip during push-off. …”
-
19
-
20