Search alternatives:
significant new » significant non (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
new decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant new » significant non (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
new decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
B2 decreases glycolytic intermediates in cells.
Published 2025“…<b>(C)</b> Heatmap of targeted metabolomic data. Each column is a separate biological replicate (n = 5). The box indicates the clustering of decreased downstream glycolytic intermediates in B2-treated cells. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Juvenile demyelination leads to a substantial decrease in potassium currents in PV interneurons of the PFC.
Published 2025“…Scale: 500 pA, 100 ms. <b>B</b>. I–V curves showing a significant decrease in Kv amplitude in PV interneurons from mice that underwent juvenile demyelination. …”
-
20
NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission.
Published 2025“…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P < 0.001). …”