Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant new » significant non (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
new decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant new » significant non (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
new decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
4141
-
4142
Wear morphology of the SP samples: (a) (b) SP1, (c) (d) SP2, and (e)(f) SP3.
Published 2024Subjects: -
4143
-
4144
-
4145
-
4146
-
4147
-
4148
-
4149
-
4150
-
4151
-
4152
-
4153
-
4154
-
4155
-
4156
Friction coefficients of various samples: (a) UT, (b) SP1, (c) SP2, and (d) SP3.
Published 2024Subjects: -
4157
Pre- & post awareness session scores.
Published 2025“…TB treatment adherence rates among TB patients using VOT was significantly better (<i>p</i><0.01) than those using DOTS.…”
-
4158
VOT vs DOTS TB treatment adherence rates.
Published 2025“…TB treatment adherence rates among TB patients using VOT was significantly better (<i>p</i><0.01) than those using DOTS.…”
-
4159
Sample size and duration of the pilot study.
Published 2025“…TB treatment adherence rates among TB patients using VOT was significantly better (<i>p</i><0.01) than those using DOTS.…”
-
4160