Search alternatives:
significant new » significant non (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
new decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant new » significant non (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
new decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
321
-
322
-
323
-
324
-
325
Summary of effects of gender on RT (in ms, bars) and ACC (in %, line), with 95% confidence interval.
Published 2024Subjects: -
326
-
327
RTs (in ms, bars) and ACC (in %, line) across all tasks, with 95% confidence interval.
Published 2024Subjects: -
328
-
329
-
330
-
331
RTs (in ms, bars) and ACC (in%, line) across blocks, with 95% confidence interval.
Published 2024Subjects: -
332
-
333
-
334
-
335
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
336
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
337
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
338
-
339
Multivariate regression analysis of AIP with depression stratified by menopausal status.
Published 2025Subjects: -
340