بدائل البحث:
significant amount » significant impact (توسيع البحث)
amount increases » point increase (توسيع البحث), nmn increases (توسيع البحث)
significant non » significant gap (توسيع البحث), significant _ (توسيع البحث), significant group (توسيع البحث)
non decrease » nn decrease (توسيع البحث), point decrease (توسيع البحث), note decreased (توسيع البحث)
significant amount » significant impact (توسيع البحث)
amount increases » point increase (توسيع البحث), nmn increases (توسيع البحث)
significant non » significant gap (توسيع البحث), significant _ (توسيع البحث), significant group (توسيع البحث)
non decrease » nn decrease (توسيع البحث), point decrease (توسيع البحث), note decreased (توسيع البحث)
-
141
Image_2_Increasing Precipitation Interval Has More Impacts on Litter Mass Loss Than Decreasing Precipitation Amount in Desert Steppe.JPEG
منشور في 2020"…The results showed that (1) both treatments have negative effects on litter mass loss; (2) for abiotic factors, both treatments affected only soil moisture; for biotic factors, both treatments decreased the litter lignin contents; the increased precipitation interval treatment decreased the litter N and K contents, but increased the litter C/N ratio and lignin/N ratio; (3) the main control of litter mass loss was due to our manipulation of drought regime and its effects on the soil decomposition environment, rather than to other factors such as litter quality or light intensity; (4) compared to decreased precipitation amount, increased precipitation interval has more impact on litter mass loss, and this was caused by the increased litter C/N ratio in increased precipitation interval treatment. …"
-
142
Image_1_Increasing Precipitation Interval Has More Impacts on Litter Mass Loss Than Decreasing Precipitation Amount in Desert Steppe.JPEG
منشور في 2020"…The results showed that (1) both treatments have negative effects on litter mass loss; (2) for abiotic factors, both treatments affected only soil moisture; for biotic factors, both treatments decreased the litter lignin contents; the increased precipitation interval treatment decreased the litter N and K contents, but increased the litter C/N ratio and lignin/N ratio; (3) the main control of litter mass loss was due to our manipulation of drought regime and its effects on the soil decomposition environment, rather than to other factors such as litter quality or light intensity; (4) compared to decreased precipitation amount, increased precipitation interval has more impact on litter mass loss, and this was caused by the increased litter C/N ratio in increased precipitation interval treatment. …"
-
143
Table_1_Increasing Precipitation Interval Has More Impacts on Litter Mass Loss Than Decreasing Precipitation Amount in Desert Steppe.DOCX
منشور في 2020"…The results showed that (1) both treatments have negative effects on litter mass loss; (2) for abiotic factors, both treatments affected only soil moisture; for biotic factors, both treatments decreased the litter lignin contents; the increased precipitation interval treatment decreased the litter N and K contents, but increased the litter C/N ratio and lignin/N ratio; (3) the main control of litter mass loss was due to our manipulation of drought regime and its effects on the soil decomposition environment, rather than to other factors such as litter quality or light intensity; (4) compared to decreased precipitation amount, increased precipitation interval has more impact on litter mass loss, and this was caused by the increased litter C/N ratio in increased precipitation interval treatment. …"
-
144
Apparent Non-Newtonian Behavior of Ionic Liquids
منشور في 2020"…Depending on the liquid and the rheological conditions, both viscosity increase and decrease have been reported. So far, these variations have been interpreted as a signature of a non-Newtonian behavior. …"
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
منشور في 2025"…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …"
-
155
-
156
-
157
-
158
-
159
-
160