Search alternatives:
significant concern » significant economic (Expand Search)
concern increases » content increases (Expand Search), confers increased (Expand Search), content increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
significant concern » significant economic (Expand Search)
concern increases » content increases (Expand Search), confers increased (Expand Search), content increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
Visualizations of trial 13 in the dat.ad dataset at multiple significance levels.
Published 2022Subjects: -
84
-
85
-
86
Apparent Non-Newtonian Behavior of Ionic Liquids
Published 2020“…Depending on the liquid and the rheological conditions, both viscosity increase and decrease have been reported. So far, these variations have been interpreted as a signature of a non-Newtonian behavior. …”
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
IR-induced mutation profiles of DNA repair mutants significantly different from wild-type.
Published 2021Subjects: -
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”