Showing 1 - 20 results of 42,911 for search '(( significant non decrease ) OR ( significant sup increase ))', query time: 1.02s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment. by Ranjeeta Adhikari (9905958)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Summary results of Model 3: Condition index (mg/cm<sup>3</sup>), D<sub>0</sub> = starting density, Temp Dir = temperature (°C) direction (- = decreasing, 0 = stable, + = increasing), Chl-a = chlorophyll a, Turb = turbidity, used as proxy for hydrodynamics stress, n.s = non-significant. by Jacob J. Capelle (17240528)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Summary results of Model 3: Condition index (mg/cm<sup>3</sup>), D<sub>0</sub> = starting density, Temp Dir = temperature (°C) direction (- = decreasing, 0 = stable, + = increasing), Chl-a = chlorophyll a, Turb = turbidity, used as proxy for hydrodynamics stress, n.s = non-significant.…”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    Data for subjects with significant slopes (regional progression or recovery colour coded, non-significant regions white) for the 4 data types over the study period. by Faran Sabeti (6166766)

    Published 2023
    “…A<sup>0</sup> and A<sup>3</sup>). Decreasing sensitivity was associated with increasing retinal thickness (cf. …”
  15. 15

    Impaired Ubr5 function results in increased canonical and decreased non-canonical HH signalling. by David Mellis (2833469)

    Published 2021
    “…Quantification confirmed <i>Ubr5</i><sup><i>mt</i></sup> AC to harbour increased numbers of positive cells for all antigens except PTCH1. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    Measurement error results<sup>b'*'</sup>. by Lotte van Dam (17347733)

    Published 2024
    “…The coefficient of variance significantly decreased with increasing knee flexion (2.27% at 0°, 1.65% at 45° and 1.20% at 90°, p<0.001). …”