Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant one » significant dna (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant among (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
one based » gene based (Expand Search), home based (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant one » significant dna (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant among (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
one based » gene based (Expand Search), home based (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
Comparison of gallbladder fossa parameters in livers from cadavers with and without gallbladders.
Published 2021Subjects: -
104
-
105
<b>Nest mass in forest tits </b><b><i>Paridae</i></b><b> </b><b>increases with elevation and decreasing body mass, promoting reproductive success</b>
Published 2025“…We found that nest mass increased by ~ 60% along the elevational gradient, but the effect of canopy openness on nest mass was not significant, while nest mass decreased along the ranked species from the smallest <i>Periparus ater</i> to the medium-sized <i>Cyanistes caeruleus</i> and the largest <i>Parus major</i>. …”
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
Global Moran’s I statistics and significance test value based on different proximity.
Published 2021“…<p>Global Moran’s I statistics and significance test value based on different proximity.…”
-
111
-
112
-
113
The significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.01) correlated unigenes based on transcriptome association analysis.
Published 2022Subjects: -
114
One way ANOVA.
Published 2024“…To minimize any effects arithmetic means of data was calculated.: The results from one-way ANOVA tests indicate significant differences among groups classified by cultural values for almost all measured variables of digitalization. …”
-
115
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
116
-
117
-
118
-
119
-
120