Search alternatives:
significant one » significant dna (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant among (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
one based » gene based (Expand Search), home based (Expand Search)
significant one » significant dna (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant among (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
one based » gene based (Expand Search), home based (Expand Search)
-
101
Data_Sheet_1_Organic Contaminant Mixture Significantly Changes Microbenthic Community Structure and Increases the Expression of PAH Degradation Genes.DOCX
Published 2020“…Conversely, a significant decrease in relative abundance from 18.2 ± 5.6% in control to 7 ± 3.4% in of the genus Paraplectana was also detected. …”
-
102
Data_Sheet_1_Organic Contaminant Mixture Significantly Changes Microbenthic Community Structure and Increases the Expression of PAH Degradation Genes.DOCX
Published 2020“…Conversely, a significant decrease in relative abundance from 18.2 ± 5.6% in control to 7 ± 3.4% in of the genus Paraplectana was also detected. …”
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
Table_1_On-Farm Trials Reveal Significant but Uncertain Control of Botrytis cinerea by Aureobasidium pullulans and Potassium Bicarbonate in Organic Grapevines.DOCX
Published 2021“…<p>Botrytis cinerea, a fungal pathogen that causes gray mold on grapes, can decrease yield, substantially reduce wine quality, and therefore cause significant economic losses. …”
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
DataSheet1_Overall Survival Prediction of Advanced Cancer Patients by Selection of the Most Significant Baseline Serum Biomarker Combination.pdf
Published 2022“…Based on assessed biomarker cut-offs, four patient groups were created to determine whether biomarker values were out of range (ORV) compared to cut-off: 1) No ORV biomarkers (n = 24; OS = 26.07 months); 2) one ORV biomarker (n = 21; OS = 13.50 months); 3) two ORV biomarkers (n = 20; OS = 7.97 months), and 4) three ORV biomarkers (n = 10; OS = 3.91 months). …”
-
113
DataSheet1_Overall Survival Prediction of Advanced Cancer Patients by Selection of the Most Significant Baseline Serum Biomarker Combination.pdf
Published 2022“…Based on assessed biomarker cut-offs, four patient groups were created to determine whether biomarker values were out of range (ORV) compared to cut-off: 1) No ORV biomarkers (n = 24; OS = 26.07 months); 2) one ORV biomarker (n = 21; OS = 13.50 months); 3) two ORV biomarkers (n = 20; OS = 7.97 months), and 4) three ORV biomarkers (n = 10; OS = 3.91 months). …”
-
114
-
115
-
116
PRISMA checklist.
Published 2023“…</p><p>Conclusions/Significance</p><p>Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease of <i>S</i>. …”
-
117
PRISMA flow diagram.
Published 2023“…</p><p>Conclusions/Significance</p><p>Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease of <i>S</i>. …”
-
118
Main characteristics of included papers.
Published 2023“…</p><p>Conclusions/Significance</p><p>Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease of <i>S</i>. …”
-
119
-
120