Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant part » significant gap (Expand Search), significant portion (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search)
part decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), bfrt decreased (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant part » significant gap (Expand Search), significant portion (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search)
part decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), bfrt decreased (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
621
-
622
-
623
-
624
-
625
SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
626
-
627
-
628
SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
629
-
630
Simulated and measured S-parameters comparison of miniaturized MIMO mobile terminal antenna.
Published 2025Subjects: -
631
-
632
-
633
SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
634
-
635
SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
636
-
637
Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance.
Published 2025Subjects: -
638
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
639
-
640
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”