Showing 1 - 20 results of 90,000 for search '(( significant peaks increase ) OR ( significant ((mean decrease) OR (_ decrease)) ))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Synaptopathy at IHC-SGN synapses decreases the peak of the CAP significantly, without changes to peak latency and width. by Maral Budak (6680351)

    Published 2021
    “…Shaded regions correspond to the standard error of the mean and dashed lines correspond to the peaks of each CAP, labeled with the same colors as the CAPs. …”
  2. 2

    Longer <i>L</i><sub><i>h</i></sub> significantly decreases and delays the peak of the sound-evoked CAPs of SGN fibers. by Maral Budak (6680351)

    Published 2021
    “…The decreased peak amplitude and increased latency of CAP peak were significant for populations with <i>L</i><sub><i>h</i></sub> > 2 μm. …”
  3. 3

    Longer <i>L</i><sub><i>u</i></sub> significantly decreases and delays the peak of the sound-evoked CAPs of SGN fibers. by Maral Budak (6680351)

    Published 2021
    “…The decrease and delay of peak CAPs were significant for populations with <i>L</i><sub><i>u</i></sub> > 11 μm. …”
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age. by Sul-Hee Kim (11873853)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
  6. 6

    The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified. by Krzysztof Kochanek (835532)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.</p>…”
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20