Search alternatives:
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
81
Trends of incident opioid users, L-TOT users, and L-TOT discontinuers between 2009 and 2013.
Published 2025Subjects: -
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
87
-
88
Variables, the Time Points Collected, and the Number of Nurses Who Responded.
Published 2025Subjects: -
89
-
90
Immunogenicity results of different vaccination schemes at different time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
91
Consecutive time points of data collection.
Published 2025“…Effect sizes expectedly decreased over time. Physical quality of life remained relatively constant over time and was the only outcome for which social integration on admission was not a significant prognostic factor.…”
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
97
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
98
-
99
-
100