General characterization of T2DM patients and healthy controls. by Ningning Wang (560944)

Subjects:

Antihypertensive treatment of 151 T2DM patients with hypertension at different subgroups. by Ningning Wang (560944)

Subjects:

Spearman correlation matrix analysis of the RAAS system and glucose metabolism indexes at different normotension subgroups. by Ningning Wang (560944)

Subjects:

Spearman correlation matrix analysis of the RAAS system and glucose metabolism indexes in hypertensive (A) and normotensive (B) patients. by Ningning Wang (560944)

Subjects:

STL Linear Combination Forecast Graph. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

Significant condition. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”

The flow of the participants from enrollment to analysis. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

Correlation between treatment-induced changes in lumbar motor control and N150 amplitude. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

Sensory-evoked potentials of N80 and N150. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

The mean and standard deviation of outcome measures. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

The demographical and clinical characteristics of subjects at baseline. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

Electrode montage and electric field distribution simulated with SimNIBS software. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

Fig 5 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 4 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 6 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 9 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

eQTL analysis of significant SNPs. by Dai Nogimura (21445649)

Subjects:

Significant associations in the candidate gene approach. by Dai Nogimura (21445649)

Subjects:

Fig 8 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m². …”