Showing 1 - 20 results of 4,739 for search '(( significant positive decrease ) OR ( significant ((bias decrease) OR (sizes decrease)) ))', query time: 0.65s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
  5. 5

    <b>The loss of insulin-positive cell clusters precedes the decrease of islet frequency and beta cell area in type 1 diabetes</b> by Denise M. Drotar (21679539)

    Published 2025
    “…Insulin-positive (INS+) single cells (≤10µm), cell clusters (>10 to <35µm), small- and medium-sized islets (35-100µm and 100-200µm) were significantly lost at type 1 diabetes onset, while large INS+ islets (>200µm) were preserved. …”
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20