Search alternatives:
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search)
positive decrease » positive breast (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search)
positive decrease » positive breast (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
43
Interannual variation rate, coefficient of variation and change trend of NDVI.
Published 2022Subjects: -
44
Means, standard deviations, ranges, and frequencies for the sample’s demographic characteristics.
Published 2022Subjects: -
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
CEC positive percentage in each group.
Published 2024“…Conversely, no significant decrease in the above inflammatory indices and no significant increase in HO-1 expression were observed in rats in the blocking group (P > 0.05).…”
-
56
The hypoxia-induced changes of HIF-1α, VEGF-a, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 at the mRNA and protein level.
Published 2022Subjects: -
57
-
58
CUMS or smoke decreased protein concentration of BDNF, but increased TrkB and P75.
Published 2022Subjects: -
59
-
60