Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
positive decrease » positive breast (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
positive decrease » positive breast (Expand Search)
-
81
Isometric maximal voluntary contraction force (MVC) interaction effects for seated position and time.
Published 2021“…<p>Star (*) symbol represents that significant MVC force decreases between initial and pre-fatigue tests, for upright and inverted seated positions. …”
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
Estimated <i>Group x time</i> interaction effects for PCS and MCS score models<sup>b'*'</sup>.
Published 2023Subjects: -
91
-
92
-
93
Significant Lipids by Category- Tiers 1 and 2.
Published 2023“…Each lipid category is divided by timepoint, with 18 hpbm shown in green, 24 hpbm shown in purple, and 36 hpbm shown in orange. The number of significant lipids differently regulated is shown on the Y-axis, with positive values indicating an increase in concentration compared with Cali-S+DENV controls, and negative values indicating a decrease in concentration. …”
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
Tun increases mitochondrial fission, inflammatory cell infiltration, and decreased ER-mitochondria interaction in neonatal rat lungs.
Published 2022“…<p>(<b>A</b>) There is no significant change in mitochondrial fusion proteins (MFN1 and MFN2) but the expression of fission protein (DRP1) is increased significantly (1.8±0.3-fold, n = 5, 3 males and 2 females per group, p = 0.001152). …”
-
98
-
99
-
100
Supplementary file 1_Water stress reduces cellulose deposition in the cell wall and increases wax content, resulting in decreased fiber quality.docx
Published 2025“…At 30 DPA, compared to the WW treatment, the sucrose contents in SD217 and XC7 fibers decreased by 18.66% and 12.85%, while cellulose contents dropped by 9.91% and 17.17%, respectively, resulting in a significant decrease in the thickness of the cell walls by 10.59% and 9.50% respectively. …”