Search alternatives:
significant potential » significant positive (Expand Search)
potential decrease » potential defense (Expand Search), potential decline (Expand Search), potentially increased (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant potential » significant positive (Expand Search)
potential decrease » potential defense (Expand Search), potential decline (Expand Search), potentially increased (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Parvalbumin-positive interneurons (PV-INs) in perilesional tissue respond to optogenetic stimulation and are involved in voluntary movement, but show a decreased firing rate.
Published 2025“…<b>E</b>, Quantification of the average firing rate of the recorded PV-INs in response to optogenetic stimulation. A significant decrease in firing activity is evident in stroke animals (Two-tailed <i>T</i> Test *** <i><i>P</i></i> < 0.001). …”
-
13
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Charts revealing A) the significant decrease (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane integrity and B) the significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane permeability after treatment with harmalacidine hydrochloride in a representative <i>S. aureus</i> isolate (n = 3 as technical repeats of the same isolate).
Published 2025“…<p>Charts revealing A) the significant decrease (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane integrity and B) the significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane permeability after treatment with harmalacidine hydrochloride in a representative <i>S. aureus</i> isolate (n = 3 as technical repeats of the same isolate).…”
-
19
-
20