Search alternatives:
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search)
changes decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search)
changes decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) During the follow-up period, the stable group showed no significant change in visual acuity, whereas the progression group exhibited a decrease compared to baseline starting at 12 months, with greater changes than those in the stable group beginning at 6 months. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
18
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
19
-
20