Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. حسب Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Multivariate regression analysis to explain the decrease in visibility and palpability. حسب Miharu Matsumoto (21304390)

Negative ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). حسب Peng-fei Han (694841)

Positive ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). حسب Peng-fei Han (694841)

Logistic regression for influenza results predictors. حسب Reem Eid (20889732)

Logistic regression for RSV results predictors. حسب Reem Eid (20889732)

Identification of ACADM, ANGPTL4, and NFKB2 as significant predictors of OS in the TCGA-KIRC cohort. حسب Yu Zhang (12946)

Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale, Subscales by Treatment Group. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Primary and secondary efficacy end points (intention-to-treat population). حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants at baseline. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Study-related adverse events. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Study flow chart. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Change in QIDS-SR-16 and MBI-HSS-MP by Treatment Group. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Study CONSORT diagram. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Change in Demoralization Scale (DSII) by Treatment Group. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group. حسب Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

الموضوعات:

Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... حسب Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

Sobel test for the significance of the mediation effect. حسب Getachew Magnar Kitila (19935139)

Predictors of SCD. حسب Iftikhar Ali Ch (20783753)

Data. حسب Su Hwan Park (15158181)

"…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …"