Search alternatives:
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
a decreased » _ decreased (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
a decreased » _ decreased (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Table_1_Decreased natural killer cell activity as a potential predictor of hypertensive incidence.docx
Published 2024“…</p>Results<p>The prevalence of hypertension was not different among the NKA quartiles, whereas blood pressures significantly decreased, followed by an increment of quartiles (systolic blood pressure of 119.0 in Q1 and 117.0 in Q4, P-trend = 0.018). …”
-
8
Logistic regression for RSV results predictors.
Published 2025“…The prevalence of co-infection was low with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.779). The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated preventive measures led to a significant decrease in the spread of influenza A and B and RSV among the Lebanese pediatric population. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Supplementary Material for: Cardiac Troponin Is Elevated in Patients with Thyrotoxicosis and Decreases as Thyroid Function Improves and Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Decrease
Published 2020“…Correlations were found between a decrease in hsTnI and BNP in the first 3 months (ρ = 0.49, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Predictors of SCD.
Published 2025“…</p><p> Results </p><p>Of 2,476 patients followed in this post-CABG study, the analysis included 1,005 patients who received aspirin monotherapy (AMT) and 1,458 patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). AMT group had a significantly higher incidence of SCD compared to those on DAPT (3.1% vs 0.8%; OR = 3.831, 95% CI: 1.961–7.519; p < 0.001). …”
-
19
-
20