Search alternatives:
significant predictors » significant reduction (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
significant predictors » significant reduction (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Enrichment Analysis Based on Ferroptosis-Related Differentially Expressed Genes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Predictors of SCD.
Published 2025“…AMT group had a significantly higher incidence of SCD compared to those on DAPT (3.1% vs 0.8%; OR = 3.831, 95% CI: 1.961–7.519; p < 0.001). …”
-
10
TBSS results showing significant AxD and RD changes at baseline and the follow-up.
Published 2025“…<p>The regions indicated in green represent the mean white matter skeleton, whereas the regions indicated in red represent the regions with increased AxD (first row) and RD (second row). The decreased diffusivity metrics (AxD and RD) exhibited no statistically significant differences at <i><i>P</i></i> < 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons (FWE). …”
-
11
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20