Echocardiographic features in decreasing order of importance to rigid body rotation in noncompaction cardiomyopathy patients. by Marcelo Dantas Tavares de Melo (11767071)

Subjects:

Stratified analysis for risk factors with statistically significant interaction terms. by Naaheed Mukadam (2590882)

The significance of predictor variables from the randomised (100) Poisson GLM models for distant trap groups. by Stella Gachoki (16024540)

Significant cell type-specific eQTL interactions. by Victor E. Nieto-Caballero (18824507)

Method of determining the order of predictors in model. by Sarah Weir (11938602)

Genome-wide gene-vegetarianism interactions reaching suggestive significance. by Michael Francis (287202)

Subjects:

Independent predictors of receiving ECR. by Deanna H. Wong (11812836)

Comparison of significant interactions found by CRISPRi-DR and MAGeCK. by Sanjeevani Choudhery (18585490)

Subjects:

In-hospital mortality predictors in univariable and multivariable analysis. by Lorena Micheline Alves Silva (11681826)

Prevalence of hyperemic coronary flow decrease. by Eisuke Usui (12111855)

Subjects:

Prediction of hyperemic coronary flow decrease. by Eisuke Usui (12111855)

Subjects:

All significant interaction terms involving the TF SPI1. by Xiaoman Xie (4070350)

Summary of predictors that increase (+ UC) and decrease (- UC) the dose of propofol for the three statistical models used for data analysis. by Chiara E. Hampton (16484687)

The DMF model reproduces the statistically significant differences in the high-order interactions of redundancy. by Marilyn Gatica (13608174)

Data for "Cell Mergers, Boundary Interactions, and Convective Systems in Cases of Significant Tornadoes and Hail" by Cameron Nixon (20934459)

“…This data was used in<i> </i>"Cell Mergers, Boundary Interactions, and Convective Systems in Cases of Significant Tornadoes and Hail" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-23-0117.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-23-0117.1</a>).…”

ChIP-GSM-predicted active regions are significantly enriched with epigenetic markers and significantly correlated with 3D chromatin interactions. by Xi Chen (35903)

Significance level of the interaction term in Eq 1. by Viviana Mancini (6861944)

The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim. by Noam Gordon (661276)

“…The expectation–attention interaction was not significant for MSPCstim (χ2 = 3.47, <i>P</i> < 0.05) but was highly significant for MSPCres (χ2 = 19.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”

Trade-off between precision and recall for selecting the subset of interactions significantly deviating from zero versus all interactions. by Kieran Elmes (11127506)

Heatmap of statistically significant interacting genes across disease states and smoking statuses. by Lavida R. K. Rogers (7829198)