Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
progress decrease » progressive decrease (Expand Search), problems decreased (Expand Search)
significant degs » significant genes (Expand Search), significant adverse (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
progress decrease » progressive decrease (Expand Search), problems decreased (Expand Search)
significant degs » significant genes (Expand Search), significant adverse (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.
Published 2025“…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
-
3
-
4
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Participants were categorized by LVEDD change from baseline: No Change (<5 mm), Decreased (≥5 mm), and Increased (≥5 mm). Results: A decrease in LVEDD was observed in 24% of participants (mean change -9±3 mm) and was significantly associated with older age, female sex, decreased volumes, concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. …”
-
19
-
20
Top 10 significant functional annotations of up-regulated DEGs.
Published 2025“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance according to the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”